Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 2145-2153.DOI: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.09.2145
• Isotope Tracer Technique·Ecology and Environment·Physiology • Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Xin(), FAN Wujing, TANG Zhouping, HE Huyi, LI Lishu
Received:
2020-07-14
Accepted:
2020-11-26
Online:
2021-09-10
Published:
2021-07-22
作者简介:
杨鑫,女,助理研究员,主要从事马铃薯栽培生理方面研究。E-mail: yangxin122009@163.com
基金资助:
YANG Xin, FAN Wujing, TANG Zhouping, HE Huyi, LI Lishu. Effects of Different Mulching Cultivation on Bacterial Diversity, Enzyme Activity and Physicochemical Properties of Potato Rhizosphere Soil[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(9): 2145-2153.
杨鑫, 樊吴静, 唐洲萍, 何虎翼, 李丽淑. 不同覆盖栽培对马铃薯根际土壤细菌多样性、酶活性及化学性状的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(9): 2145-2153.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.hnxb.org.cn/EN/10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.09.2145
多样性指数 Alpha index | 处理 Treatment | 苗期 Seedling | 块茎形成期 Tuber initiation | 块茎膨大期 Tuber bulking | 淀粉积累期 Starch accumulation | 块茎成熟期 Tuber maturation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shannon指数 Shannon index | BFM | 6.09±0.10a | 6.06±0.10a | 6.19±0.12a | 6.13±0.03a | 9.18±0.06a |
RSM | 5.69±0.05a | 5.68±0.02a | 5.94±0.12a | 6.11±0.05a | 6.00±0.06a | |
CK | 5.99±0.23a | 5.86±0.17a | 6.13±0.11a | 6.01±0.12a | 5.91±0.07a | |
Chao1指数 Chao1 index | BFM | 1 613.60±3.35a | 1 620.05±2.40a | 1 643.34±7.12a | 1 621.25±7.42a | 1 635.55±2.92a |
RSM | 1 522.93±13.99b | 1 614.03±3.45ab | 1 625.12±8.59a | 1 620.59±6.93a | 1 607.68±7.90b | |
CK | 1 602.98±5.67a | 1 608.03±1.54b | 1 615.5±8.38a | 1 597.47±5.56a | 1 608.65±3.26b |
Table 1 Diversity index of bacteria in rhizosphere soil during the whole growth period of potato under the different treatments
多样性指数 Alpha index | 处理 Treatment | 苗期 Seedling | 块茎形成期 Tuber initiation | 块茎膨大期 Tuber bulking | 淀粉积累期 Starch accumulation | 块茎成熟期 Tuber maturation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shannon指数 Shannon index | BFM | 6.09±0.10a | 6.06±0.10a | 6.19±0.12a | 6.13±0.03a | 9.18±0.06a |
RSM | 5.69±0.05a | 5.68±0.02a | 5.94±0.12a | 6.11±0.05a | 6.00±0.06a | |
CK | 5.99±0.23a | 5.86±0.17a | 6.13±0.11a | 6.01±0.12a | 5.91±0.07a | |
Chao1指数 Chao1 index | BFM | 1 613.60±3.35a | 1 620.05±2.40a | 1 643.34±7.12a | 1 621.25±7.42a | 1 635.55±2.92a |
RSM | 1 522.93±13.99b | 1 614.03±3.45ab | 1 625.12±8.59a | 1 620.59±6.93a | 1 607.68±7.90b | |
CK | 1 602.98±5.67a | 1 608.03±1.54b | 1 615.5±8.38a | 1 597.47±5.56a | 1 608.65±3.26b |
Fig.1 Relative abundance of bacteria phylum in rhizosphere soils during the growth period under different treatments Note:B: Black film mulching. R: Rice straw mulching. CK: Conventional practice. 1 to 5 is seedling stage, tuber initiation, tuber bulking, starch accumulation, tuber maturation. The same as following.
Fig.3 Soil enzyme activity of rhizosphere soil during the growth period of potato under different treatments Note: 1-5 is seeding stage, tuber initiation, tuber bulking, starch accumulation, tuber maturation. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference between different mulching modes during the same growth period at 0.05 level. The same as following.
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height /cm | 主茎数 Mainstem quantity | 单株块茎数 Tuber number per plant | 单株块 茎重 Tuber weight per plant/kg | 单薯重 Single tuber weight/kg | 大薯重 Big potato weight (>100 g)/kg | 小薯重 Small potato weight (<100 g)/kg | 商品薯率 Commodity potato rate/% | 产量 Yield /(t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFM | 60.6±1.11a | 2.0±0.3a | 5.6±0.54a | 0.83±0.09a | 0.16±0.03a | 65.58±1.04a | 4.21±0.69a | 93.99±0.93a | 38.79±0.78a |
RSM | 56.2±0.73b | 1.8±0.25a | 5.5±0.52a | 0.79±0.12a | 0.15±0.02a | 63.45±0.14a | 4.74±0.42a | 93.06±0.55a | 37.90±0.31a |
CK | 56.0±1.39b | 1.6±0.31a | 4.4±0.51a | 0.55±0.09a | 0.12±0.01a | 54.58±2.99b | 4.61±0.29a | 92.14±0.84a | 32.90±1.50b |
Table 2 Agronomic characters and yield of potato under different cultivation modes
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height /cm | 主茎数 Mainstem quantity | 单株块茎数 Tuber number per plant | 单株块 茎重 Tuber weight per plant/kg | 单薯重 Single tuber weight/kg | 大薯重 Big potato weight (>100 g)/kg | 小薯重 Small potato weight (<100 g)/kg | 商品薯率 Commodity potato rate/% | 产量 Yield /(t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFM | 60.6±1.11a | 2.0±0.3a | 5.6±0.54a | 0.83±0.09a | 0.16±0.03a | 65.58±1.04a | 4.21±0.69a | 93.99±0.93a | 38.79±0.78a |
RSM | 56.2±0.73b | 1.8±0.25a | 5.5±0.52a | 0.79±0.12a | 0.15±0.02a | 63.45±0.14a | 4.74±0.42a | 93.06±0.55a | 37.90±0.31a |
CK | 56.0±1.39b | 1.6±0.31a | 4.4±0.51a | 0.55±0.09a | 0.12±0.01a | 54.58±2.99b | 4.61±0.29a | 92.14±0.84a | 32.90±1.50b |
碱解氮含量 Alkaline nitrogen content | 速效磷含量 Available phosphorus content | 速效钾含量 Available potassium content | 有机质含量 Organic matter content | pH值 pH value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shannon指数Shannon index | 0.242 | -0.022 | 0.358* | 0.451** | 0.339* |
Chao1指数Chao1 index | 0.001 | 0.424** | 0.286 | 0.215 | 0.212 |
过氧化氢酶活性Catalase activity | 0.322* | -0.125 | 0.496** | 0.207 | 0.228 |
脲酶活性Urease activity | 0.620** | 0.162 | 0.479** | 0.423** | 0.299** |
蔗糖酶活性Invertase activity | 0.706** | 0.108 | 0.563** | 0.327* | 0.547* |
酸性磷酸酶活性Phosphatase activity | 0.563* | 0.426** | 0.835** | 0.25 | 0.327* |
Table 3 Correlative analysis between diversity index of bacteria andenzyme activity, Soil physical and chemical properties of rhizosphere soils
碱解氮含量 Alkaline nitrogen content | 速效磷含量 Available phosphorus content | 速效钾含量 Available potassium content | 有机质含量 Organic matter content | pH值 pH value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shannon指数Shannon index | 0.242 | -0.022 | 0.358* | 0.451** | 0.339* |
Chao1指数Chao1 index | 0.001 | 0.424** | 0.286 | 0.215 | 0.212 |
过氧化氢酶活性Catalase activity | 0.322* | -0.125 | 0.496** | 0.207 | 0.228 |
脲酶活性Urease activity | 0.620** | 0.162 | 0.479** | 0.423** | 0.299** |
蔗糖酶活性Invertase activity | 0.706** | 0.108 | 0.563** | 0.327* | 0.547* |
酸性磷酸酶活性Phosphatase activity | 0.563* | 0.426** | 0.835** | 0.25 | 0.327* |
[1] |
Velasquez E, Lavelle P, Andeade M. GISQ, a multifunctional indicator of soil quality[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2007, 39(12):3066-3080
DOI URL |
[2] | 王光华, 金剑, 徐美娜, 刘晓冰. 植物、土壤及土壤管理对土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 生物学杂志, 2006, 25(5):550-556 |
[3] | 王理德, 王方琳, 郭春秀, 韩福贵, 魏林源, 李发明. 土壤酶学研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(1):12-21 |
[4] |
Becraft E D, Woyke T, Jarett J, Ivanova N, Vitorino F G, Poulton N, Brown J M, Brown J, Lau M C Y, Onstott T, Eisen J A, Moser D, Stepanauskas R. Rokubacteria: Genomic giants among the uncultured bacterial phyla[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2017, 8:2264
DOI PMID |
[5] | 刘洋, 易晓峰, 罗其友, 高明杰, 张萌. 中国马铃薯贸易与营销策略分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(2):180-185 |
[6] | 韦炳佩, 宾荣佩. 浅谈广西马铃薯产业发展的机遇及挑战[J]. 南方园艺, 2015, 26(1):28-32 |
[7] | 陈华贇. 马铃薯兴佳2号稻草包心高产栽培示范小结[J]. 福建稻麦科技, 2016, 34(4):39-40 |
[8] | 周丽敏, 张皓, 李琪, 韩媛, 谢佳. 黑色地膜对马铃薯产量及土壤质量的影响[J]. 南京信息工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 8(4):316-321 |
[9] | 周东亮, 叶丙鑫, 王姣敏, 张晶. 黑色地膜双垄覆盖对马铃薯干物质和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2018(2):47-52 |
[10] | 姜晓芳. 马铃薯稻草包芯根际土壤微生物多样性分析[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2016 |
[11] | 李丽淑, 樊吴静, 杨鑫, 谭冠宁, 唐洲萍, 何虎翼. 不同栽培模式对土壤理化性状及广西冬种马铃薯产量的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2018, 49(1):36-41 |
[12] | 高彦萍, 胡新元, 李掌, 吴雁斌, 张武, 齐恩芳. 高寒阴湿区不同覆膜马铃薯微型薯的土壤水热效应及产量表现[J]. 核农学报, 2017, 31(12):2426-2433 |
[13] | 陈和平, 窦俊焕, 郭天顺, 王鹏, 李芳弟, 劼炜清, 罗照霞, 齐小东, 吕汰. 甘肃中部高寒区覆盖栽培对马铃薯土壤酶活性及产量变化影响[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2019, 33(1):21-27 |
[14] | 赵章平, 要凯, 康益晨, 张卫娜, 范艳玲, 杨昕宇, 张俊莲, 秦舒浩. 沟垄覆膜栽培对连作马铃薯根系分泌物和土壤养分的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2020, 55(2):83-89 |
[15] | 关松荫, 张德生, 张志明. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社出版, 1986: 260-261 |
[16] | 南京农学院. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1980: 33-93 |
[17] | 黄修梅, 李明, 戎素萍, 胡云, 杨进, 张艳彦. 生物炭添加对马铃薯根际土壤真菌多样性和产量的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2019(1):51-56 |
[18] | 徐雪雪. 基于高通量测序的马铃薯沟垄覆膜连作土壤微生物多样性分析[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2016 |
[19] |
Nyankanga R O, Wien H C, Olanya O M. Effects of mulch and potato hilling on development of foliar blight (phytophthora infestans) and the control of tuber blight infection[J]. Potato Research, 2008, 51:101-111
DOI URL |
[20] | 刘云. 轮作蚕豆对沟垄覆膜马铃薯连作土壤微生物群落及多样性的影响[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2018 |
[21] | 王光华, 刘俊杰, 于镇华, 王新珍, 金剑, 刘晓冰. 土壤酸杆菌门细菌生态学研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2016, 32(2):14-20 |
[22] | 刘奎, 葛壮, 徐英德, 刘磊, 叶超, 李明, 赵搏, 梁爱珍, 张彬, 汪景宽. 不同耕作方式下黑土微生物群对干湿交替的响应[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(1):206-216 |
[23] | 邓超超, 李玲玲, 谢军红, 彭正凯, 王进斌, 劼建辉, 沈吉成, Eunice Essel. 耕作措施对陇中旱农区土壤细菌群落的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2019, 56(1):207-216 |
[24] | 沈宗专. 抑制香蕉土传枯萎病土壤的微生物区系特征及调控[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2015 |
[25] | 崔晓莹, 蔡柏岩. AM真菌对连作障碍土壤中放线菌菌群多样性的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(27):100-105 |
[26] | 李旺霞, 陈彦云, 陈科元, 马灵敏, 马小彦. 不同覆膜栽培对马铃薯土壤酶活性和土壤微生物的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2015, 28(5):2154-2157 |
[27] | 李浩然, 曹君迈, 苏红玉. 覆膜栽培方式对雨养区马铃薯土壤酶活性和土壤微生物及产量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(3):467-470 |
[28] | 要凯, 赵章平, 康益晨, 张卫娜, 石铭副, 杨昕宇, 范艳玲, 秦舒浩. 沟垄覆膜对马铃薯土壤酶活性、理化性状及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(8):1286-1292 |
[29] | 孙梦媛. 全覆膜垄作种植对马铃薯生长和土壤特性的影响[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2018 |
[30] | 徐丽婷. 沟垄覆膜种植对连作马铃薯根系分泌物和土壤化学性质的影响[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2017 |
[31] | 高彦波, 翟鹏辉, 谭德远. 土壤酶活性与土壤肥力的关系研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(6):100-101 |
[32] |
Chang E H, Chung R S, Tsai Y H. Effect of different application rates of organic fertilizer on soil enzyme activity and microbial population[J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2007, 53(2):132-140
DOI URL |
[33] | 曹慧, 孙辉, 杨浩, 孙波, 赵其国. 土壤酶活性及其对土壤质量的指示研究进展[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2003, 9(1):105-109 |
[34] |
Rosen C J, Kelling K A, Stark J C, Porter G A. Optimizing phosphorus fertilizer management in potato production[J]. American Journal of Potato Research, 2014, 91(2):145-160
DOI URL |
[35] | 张鑫, 陈杨, 秦永林, 樊明寿. 马铃薯钾速营养研究进展及营养诊断[J]. 北方农业学报, 2016, 44(1):109-112 |
[36] | 吴晶, 王娟娟, 朱腾义, 惠珊, 刘玲玲, 钱晓晴. 不同施肥和栽培措施对水稻土壤微生物多样性的影响综述[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(10):14-17 |
[37] | 张立超. 不同施肥处理对马铃薯土壤可培养微生物数量和有机质含量的影响[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2016 |
[38] | 王东. 沟垄覆膜连作种植对马铃薯田土壤微生物区系及酶活性的影响[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2015 |
[1] | ZHOU Shuqian, CHEN Lu, CHEN Huiyun, LI Yongxin, CHEN Gang, LU Guoquan, YANG Huqing. Bioinformatics and Expression Analysis of Alternative Oxidase Genes in Sweetpotato [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(2): 270-281. |
[2] | HE Jie, LIANG Shuang, LI Zhong, ZHAO Zhi. Pathogen Indentification of Lysimachia christinae Leaf Sopt and Screening of Antagonistic Bacterial Strains [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(2): 282-290. |
[3] | LIU Lingling, AN Congcong, YE Ximiao, YUAN Jianlong, WANG Yuping, ZHANG Feng. Relationships Among Apical Dominance of Potato Tuber, the Number of Main Stem and Yield Components [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(2): 329-340. |
[4] | HOU Fuyun, CHEN Guiling, DONG Shunxu, XIE Beitao, QIN Zhen, LI Aixian, ZHANG Liming, WANG Qingmei. Comparative Study on Starch Composition, Physicochemical Properties and Noodle Quality of Different Sweet Potato Varieties [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(2): 392-401. |
[5] | BAN Wenhui, WANG Xingqiang, LIU Qiangjuan, SUN Jianbo, LYU Kaiyuan, KANG Jianhong. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Potato Yield, Starch Content and Related Enzyme Metabolic During Tuber Formation After High Temperature Stress [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(2): 422-434. |
[6] | WANG Zhongtang, SHA Jianchuan, XIE Xiaofeng, MENG Xiaoye, ZHAO Dengchao, PENG Ling, ZHANG Qiong. Effects of Different Grasses Cultivation on Soil Nutrient and Bacterial Community in Chinese Jujube Orchard [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(2): 456-465. |
[7] | LI Huixian, FENG Bo, HUANG Liujuan, SHAO Yi, ZHANG Donglai. Prevalence and Characteristics of Tetracycline-Resistant Bacteria in Bulk Soft-Boiled Chicken [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(1): 129-135. |
[8] | MA Caixia, LIANG Qi, WANG Xiangzhu, LIU Ying. The Bacterial Community Diversity of Traditional Fermented Yak Milk in Gannan of Gansu [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(1): 154-162. |
[9] | NI Dong, CHEN Yingsu, LI Shuang, TANG Yufan, LIU Xiangyu, YIN Le, ZHOU Yanli. Effects of Companion Planting of Melon With Onion on Enzyme Activities and Bacterial Community in Rhizosphere Soil [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(1): 201-209. |
[10] | WEI Lei, LIU Kaimeng, DONG Zhongfu, XU Jingyi, WU Yijiao, XIONG Chunyu, SUN Jie, WANG Caixia. Effect of Humidity on Wound Healing of Sweet Potato [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(9): 2111-2117. |
[11] | WEN Hongwei, YANG Bin, WANG Dongsheng. Research Progress on Promoting Growth and Drought Resistance of Wheat by Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(9): 2194-2203. |
[12] | TIAN Jiachun, TIAN Shilong, LI Shouqiang, GE Xia, LI Mei, CHENG Jianxin. Effects of Low Oxygen and High Carbon Dioxide Storage Environment on Starch-Glucose Metabolism of Potato Tubers [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(8): 1832-1840. |
[13] | LI Na, ZHOU Hongli, WU Weiguo, LIAO Luyan, LIU Bo, ZONG Ping, REN Jianhao, ZHOU Tao. Identification and Analysis of Dominant Molds in Rice in Different Granaries [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(8): 1841-1847. |
[14] | ZHANG Jie, YANG Xijuan, DANG Bin, ZHANG Wengang, LAN Jialia. Phenolic Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Seed Coats of Faba Beans With Different Colors [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(8): 1848-1857. |
[15] | XING Min, FEI Peng, GUO Ling, KANG Huaibin. Antibacterial Activity, Mechanism and Application of Plant-Derived Natural Products in Food Preservation [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(8): 1875-1882. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||