Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 2136-2144.DOI: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.09.2136
• Isotope Tracer Technique·Ecology and Environment·Physiology • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Siyang(), LI Guanghao, LU Weiping, LU Dalei*(
)
Received:
2020-08-10
Accepted:
2020-11-26
Online:
2021-09-10
Published:
2021-07-22
Contact:
LU Dalei
通讯作者:
陆大雷
作者简介:
王思阳,女,主要从事玉米栽培生理研究。E-mail: 347382649@qq.com
基金资助:
WANG Siyang, LI Guanghao, LU Weiping, LU Dalei. Effects of Slow-Release Fertilizer Application Stage on Yield and Quality of Spring-Sown Fresh Waxy Maize[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(9): 2136-2144.
王思阳, 李广浩, 陆卫平, 陆大雷. 缓释肥施用时期对春播鲜食糯玉米产量和籽粒品质的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(9): 2136-2144.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.hnxb.org.cn/EN/10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.09.2136
年份 Year | 有机质 Organic matter /(g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total N /(g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkali hydrolysable N /(mg·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available P /(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Exchangeable K /(mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 11.80 | 0.97 | 32.12 | 5.95 | 61.01 |
2019 | 9.16 | 1.12 | 29.16 | 7.36 | 72.16 |
Table 1 Status of basic soil capacity of the test site in 2018 and 2019
年份 Year | 有机质 Organic matter /(g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total N /(g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkali hydrolysable N /(mg·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available P /(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Exchangeable K /(mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 11.80 | 0.97 | 32.12 | 5.95 | 61.01 |
2019 | 9.16 | 1.12 | 29.16 | 7.36 | 72.16 |
Fig.1 Effects of slow-release fertilizer application stage on yield of fresh waxy maize Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference among treatment at 0.05 level in the same year. The same as following.
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 峰值黏度 PV/(mPa·s) | 谷值黏度 TV/(mPa·s) | 崩解值 BD/(mPa·s) | 终值黏度 FV/(mPa·s) | 回复值 SB/(mPa·s) | 糊化温度 Ptemp/℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | N0 | 644ab | 577a | 55a | 790ab | 210bc | 80.5b |
N15CK | 554bc | 537a | 16b | 759b | 225b | 82.0a | |
SN15-0 | 664ab | 648a | 10b | 931a | 284a | 81.5ab | |
SN15-3 | 736a | 652a | 79a | 871ab | 242b | 80.9ab | |
SN15-6 | 427c | 414b | 8b | 595c | 176c | 81.8ab | |
2019 | N0 | 310b | 139c | 171a | 198c | 87c | 77.3c |
N15CK | 274b | 253bc | 15b | 371bc | 141bc | 77.3c | |
SN15-0 | 358b | 336b | 22b | 483b | 147b | 80.6b | |
SN15-3 | 591a | 541a | 51b | 757a | 216a | 82.4a | |
SN15-6 | 357b | 300b | 47b | 400bc | 83c | 77.9c | |
F值 F-value | 年份 Year | 40.6** | 89.9** | 4.1 | 92.5** | 82.1** | 125.2** |
处理 Treatment | 7.3** | 12.2** | 7.6** | 12.1** | 13.8** | 8.6** | |
年份×处理 Year×treatment | 2.0 | 5.5** | 3.3* | 5.7** | 3.5* | 7.7** |
Table 2 Effect of slow-release fertilizer application stage on grain pasting characteristics of fresh waxy maize
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 峰值黏度 PV/(mPa·s) | 谷值黏度 TV/(mPa·s) | 崩解值 BD/(mPa·s) | 终值黏度 FV/(mPa·s) | 回复值 SB/(mPa·s) | 糊化温度 Ptemp/℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | N0 | 644ab | 577a | 55a | 790ab | 210bc | 80.5b |
N15CK | 554bc | 537a | 16b | 759b | 225b | 82.0a | |
SN15-0 | 664ab | 648a | 10b | 931a | 284a | 81.5ab | |
SN15-3 | 736a | 652a | 79a | 871ab | 242b | 80.9ab | |
SN15-6 | 427c | 414b | 8b | 595c | 176c | 81.8ab | |
2019 | N0 | 310b | 139c | 171a | 198c | 87c | 77.3c |
N15CK | 274b | 253bc | 15b | 371bc | 141bc | 77.3c | |
SN15-0 | 358b | 336b | 22b | 483b | 147b | 80.6b | |
SN15-3 | 591a | 541a | 51b | 757a | 216a | 82.4a | |
SN15-6 | 357b | 300b | 47b | 400bc | 83c | 77.9c | |
F值 F-value | 年份 Year | 40.6** | 89.9** | 4.1 | 92.5** | 82.1** | 125.2** |
处理 Treatment | 7.3** | 12.2** | 7.6** | 12.1** | 13.8** | 8.6** | |
年份×处理 Year×treatment | 2.0 | 5.5** | 3.3* | 5.7** | 3.5* | 7.7** |
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 热焓值 ΔHgel/(J·g-1) | 起始温度 To/℃ | 峰值温度 Tp/℃ | 终值温度 Tc/℃ | 回生热焓值 ΔHret/(J·g-1) | 回生值 R/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | N0 | 8.30b | 70.7d | 76.4c | 82.6d | 3.15a | 41.8a |
N15CK | 8.83a | 73.3a | 78.9ab | 85.6ab | 2.29c | 32.0b | |
SN15-0 | 8.75a | 72bc | 78.1b | 84.2c | 2.62bc | 33.0b | |
SN15-3 | 8.73a | 71.6cd | 78.2ab | 84.8bc | 2.98ab | 33.2b | |
SN15-6 | 8.97a | 73.1ab | 79.2a | 86.2a | 2.25c | 31.7b | |
2019 | N0 | 8.17b | 70.5c | 75.9b | 82.7c | 3.30a | 41.5a |
N15CK | 8.92a | 72.9a | 78.8a | 85.2ab | 2.46bc | 33.0bc | |
SN15-0 | 8.47ab | 71.8b | 78.4a | 84.3b | 2.55b | 34.4b | |
SN15-3 | 8.68a | 71.7b | 78.1a | 84.3b | 2.49b | 34.2b | |
SN15-6 | 8.98a | 72.9a | 78.8a | 85.5a | 2.27c | 31.7c | |
F值 F-value | 年份 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 3.6 |
处理 | 8.9** | 20.7** | 31.8** | 22.7** | 20.2** | 131.8** | |
年份×处理 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 2.6 | 1.0 |
Table 3 Effect of slow-release fertilizer application stage on grain thermal characteristics of fresh waxy maize
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 热焓值 ΔHgel/(J·g-1) | 起始温度 To/℃ | 峰值温度 Tp/℃ | 终值温度 Tc/℃ | 回生热焓值 ΔHret/(J·g-1) | 回生值 R/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | N0 | 8.30b | 70.7d | 76.4c | 82.6d | 3.15a | 41.8a |
N15CK | 8.83a | 73.3a | 78.9ab | 85.6ab | 2.29c | 32.0b | |
SN15-0 | 8.75a | 72bc | 78.1b | 84.2c | 2.62bc | 33.0b | |
SN15-3 | 8.73a | 71.6cd | 78.2ab | 84.8bc | 2.98ab | 33.2b | |
SN15-6 | 8.97a | 73.1ab | 79.2a | 86.2a | 2.25c | 31.7b | |
2019 | N0 | 8.17b | 70.5c | 75.9b | 82.7c | 3.30a | 41.5a |
N15CK | 8.92a | 72.9a | 78.8a | 85.2ab | 2.46bc | 33.0bc | |
SN15-0 | 8.47ab | 71.8b | 78.4a | 84.3b | 2.55b | 34.4b | |
SN15-3 | 8.68a | 71.7b | 78.1a | 84.3b | 2.49b | 34.2b | |
SN15-6 | 8.98a | 72.9a | 78.8a | 85.5a | 2.27c | 31.7c | |
F值 F-value | 年份 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 3.6 |
处理 | 8.9** | 20.7** | 31.8** | 22.7** | 20.2** | 131.8** | |
年份×处理 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 2.6 | 1.0 |
指标 Index | 可溶性 糖含量 Soluble sugar content | 淀粉 含量 Starch content | 蛋白质 含量 Protein content | 最大吸 收波长 λmax | 碘结 合力 Iodine binding capacity | 平均 粒径 Starch granule size | 热焓值 ΔHgel | 峰值 温度 Tp | 回生值 R | 峰值 黏度 FV | 崩解值 BD | 回复值 SB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
淀粉含量 Starch content | 0.84** | |||||||||||
蛋白质含量 Protein content | 0.87** | 0.94** | ||||||||||
最大吸收波长 λmax | 0.90** | 0.92** | 0.86** | |||||||||
碘结合力 Iodine binding capacity | 0.79** | 0.70* | 0.59 | 0.84** | ||||||||
平均粒径 Starch granule size | -0.02 | 0.0 | -0.2 | 0.23 | -0.11 | |||||||
热焓值 Δ Hgel | 0.92** | 0.87** | 0.84** | 0.91** | 0.82** | 0.17 | ||||||
峰值温度 Tp | 0.93** | 0.93** | 0.87** | 0.97** | 0.84** | -0.62 | 0.91** | |||||
回生值 R | -0.92** | -0.87** | -0.79** | -0.98** | -0.88** | 0.21 | -0.92** | -0.97** | ||||
峰值黏度 FV | 0.05 | -0.41 | -0.39 | -0.14 | 0.06 | -0.86* | -0.04 | -0.1 | 0 | |||
崩解值 BD | -0.81* | -0.63* | -0.64* | -0.68* | -0.66* | -0.08 | -0.69* | -0.79** | -0.70* | -0.12 | ||
回复值 SB | 0.2 | -0.24 | -0.26 | 0.07 | 0.32 | 0.77* | 0.12 | 0.12 | -0.2 | 0.88** | -0.27 | |
糊化温度 Ptemp | 0.31 | -0.03 | 0.05 | 0.25 | 0.38 | -0.72 | 0.15 | 0.29 | -0.3 | 0.71* | -0.14 | 0.79** |
Table 4 Correlation coefficients of grain quality parameters
指标 Index | 可溶性 糖含量 Soluble sugar content | 淀粉 含量 Starch content | 蛋白质 含量 Protein content | 最大吸 收波长 λmax | 碘结 合力 Iodine binding capacity | 平均 粒径 Starch granule size | 热焓值 ΔHgel | 峰值 温度 Tp | 回生值 R | 峰值 黏度 FV | 崩解值 BD | 回复值 SB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
淀粉含量 Starch content | 0.84** | |||||||||||
蛋白质含量 Protein content | 0.87** | 0.94** | ||||||||||
最大吸收波长 λmax | 0.90** | 0.92** | 0.86** | |||||||||
碘结合力 Iodine binding capacity | 0.79** | 0.70* | 0.59 | 0.84** | ||||||||
平均粒径 Starch granule size | -0.02 | 0.0 | -0.2 | 0.23 | -0.11 | |||||||
热焓值 Δ Hgel | 0.92** | 0.87** | 0.84** | 0.91** | 0.82** | 0.17 | ||||||
峰值温度 Tp | 0.93** | 0.93** | 0.87** | 0.97** | 0.84** | -0.62 | 0.91** | |||||
回生值 R | -0.92** | -0.87** | -0.79** | -0.98** | -0.88** | 0.21 | -0.92** | -0.97** | ||||
峰值黏度 FV | 0.05 | -0.41 | -0.39 | -0.14 | 0.06 | -0.86* | -0.04 | -0.1 | 0 | |||
崩解值 BD | -0.81* | -0.63* | -0.64* | -0.68* | -0.66* | -0.08 | -0.69* | -0.79** | -0.70* | -0.12 | ||
回复值 SB | 0.2 | -0.24 | -0.26 | 0.07 | 0.32 | 0.77* | 0.12 | 0.12 | -0.2 | 0.88** | -0.27 | |
糊化温度 Ptemp | 0.31 | -0.03 | 0.05 | 0.25 | 0.38 | -0.72 | 0.15 | 0.29 | -0.3 | 0.71* | -0.14 | 0.79** |
[1] | 潘伟明. 糯玉米生产现状及其产品开发进展[J]. 广东农业科学, 2010, 37(6):155-157 |
[2] | 张光宇. 不同施氮水平对糯玉米农艺性状和品质性状的影响[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2016 |
[3] | 刘德江, 李青军, 高伟, 饶晓娟, 齐士发, 张炎. 施肥对玉米养分吸收利用、产量及肥料效益的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2009(4):56-59 |
[4] | 魏磊, 刘振明. 玉米灌水和施肥特性对产量品质影响研究现状[J]. 山西农经, 2018(12):50-51, 53 |
[5] | 彭畅, 刘晓斌, 尹彩侠, 李桂花, 张淑香, 尹昌斌. 不同形态氮肥及其运筹对春玉米产量和农艺性状的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2013, 27(4):509-514 |
[6] | 文章荣, 李广浩, 王珏, 张世博, 顾晓天, 丁梦秋, 陆卫平, 陆大雷. 江苏省鲜食玉米化肥农药使用及生产现状调研与分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(7):91-96 |
[7] | 何萍, 金继运, 林葆, 王秀芳, 张宽. 不同氮磷钾用量下春玉米生物产量及其组分动态与养分吸收模式研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1998, 4(2):123-130 |
[8] | 徐敏云, 李建国, 谢帆, 曹玉凤, 敖特根, 于海良, 李佳祥, 李运起. 不同施肥处理对青贮玉米生长和产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(3):245-250 |
[9] |
Shoji S, Gandeza A T, Kimura K. Simulation of crop response to polyolefin-coated urea Ⅱ. Nitrogen uptake by corn[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1991, 55(5):1468-1473
DOI URL |
[10] | 王乐, 康建宏, 梁熠, 冯朋博, 徐灿. 控释/普通尿素配施对春玉米籽粒灌浆特性及产量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(10):2054-2061 |
[11] | 苏琳, 董志新, 邵国庆, 李增嘉, 宁堂原. 控释尿素施用方式及用量对夏玉米氮肥效率和产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(4):915-920 |
[12] | 司东霞, 崔振岭, 陈新平, 吕福堂. 不同控释氮肥对夏玉米同化物积累及氮平衡的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(6):1745-1751 |
[13] | 杨小梅, 刘树伟, 秦艳梅, 陈楠楠, 邹建文. 中国玉米化学氮肥利用率的时空变异特征[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(10):1184-1192 |
[14] | 肖强, 徐秋明, 衣文平, 杨俊刚, 倪小会, 孙红帅, 曹兵. 不同灌溉量下微水溶性缓释肥料在春玉米的肥效及环境效应研究[J]. 核农学报, 2012, 26(6):930-935 |
[15] | 臧贺藏, 王言景, 张杰, 胡峰, 李国强, 郑国清. 不同氮肥模式对夏玉米产量、蛋白质品质和氮素利用特性的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2015, 23(6):108-113 |
[16] | 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 施氮量对夏玉米籽粒灌浆特性和营养品质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(11):3771-3776 |
[17] | 张智猛, 戴良香, 胡昌浩, 董树亭, 王空军. 氮素对玉米淀粉累积及相关酶活性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(7):956-962 |
[18] | 陈洋, 赵宏伟. 氮素用量对春玉米淀粉及其组分形成积累的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(10):225-229 |
[19] | 石德杨, 张海艳, 董树亭. 补充灌溉和施氮对玉米籽粒淀粉粒粒度分布的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(4):633-643 |
[20] | 尹梅, 洪丽芳, 付利波, 陈华, 王劲松, 卢俊媛, 苏帆. 不同施肥时期对玉米产量和质量的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2012, 27(1):123-128 |
[21] | 王启现, 王璞, 王伟东, 鲁来清. 吐丝期施氮对夏玉米粒重和籽粒粗蛋白的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2002, 7(1):59-64 |
[22] |
Sabahi H, Ghalavand A, Sanavy S A. Impacts of fertilization systems on nitrogen loss and yield of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)[J]. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 2008, 11(2):232-237
DOI URL |
[23] |
Zheng W K, Liu Z G, Zhang M, Shi Y F, Zhu Q, Sun Y B, Zhou H Y, Li C L, Yang Y C, Geng J B. Improving crop yields, nitrogen use efficiencies, and profits by using mixtures of coated controlled-released and uncoated urea in a wheat-maize system[J]. Field Crops Research, 2017, 205:106-115
DOI URL |
[24] | 李广浩, 董树亭, 赵斌, 张吉旺, 刘鹏. 不同土壤水分状况下实现夏玉米高产及氮素高效的控释尿素用量研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(3):579-589 |
[25] | 安文博, 孙焱鑫, 李占台, 王激清, 邹国元, 杨俊刚. 不同缓控释肥对鲜食玉米产量、品质及氨挥发的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7):2422-2430 |
[26] | 陆大雷, 王鑫, 孙旭利, 徐仁超, 闫发宝, 陆卫平. 基肥配施和拔节期追氮对糯玉米粉糊化特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(5):909-916 |
[27] | AACC. AACC46-10 Crude protein-Improved Kjeldahl method[S]. St Paul, MN: AACCI, 1999 |
[28] |
Hansen J, Moller Ⅰ. Percolation of starch and soluble carbohydrates from plant tissue for quantitative determination with anthrone[J]. Analytical Biochemistry, 1975, 68(1):87-94
PMID |
[29] |
Lu D L, Cai X M, Zhao J Y, Shen X, Lu W P. Effects of drought after pollination on grain yield and quality of fresh waxy maize[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2015, 95(1):210-215
DOI URL |
[30] |
Lu D L, Shen X, Cai X M, Yan F B, Lu W P, Shi Y C. Effects of heat stress during grain filling on the structure and thermal properties of waxy maize starch[J]. Food Chemistry, 2014, 143:313-318
DOI URL |
[31] |
Lu D L, Lu W P. Effects of protein removal on the physicochemical properties of waxy maize flours[J]. Starch-Stärke, 2012, 64(11):874-881
DOI URL |
[32] | 邢燕菊, 阴卫军, 邱登林, 王同燕, 马驰, 丁一, 徐立华. 鲜食玉米的品质评价及采收期品质变化[J]. 山东农业科学, 2010(11):44-46 |
[33] | 郭斌. 缓控释氮肥在玉米增产增效中的应用研究进展[J]. 南方农业, 2020, 14(26):220-221 |
[34] | 朱红英, 董树亭, 胡昌浩. 不同控释肥料对玉米产量及产量性状影响的研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2003, 11(4):86-89 |
[35] | 王宜伦, 卢艳丽, 刘举, 苏瑞光, 马龙, 谭金芳, 白由路. 专用缓释肥对夏玉米产量及养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015(1):29-32 |
[36] | 赵洪祥, 边少锋, 孙宁, 蔡红梅, 杨洪亮, 邱菊, 韩喜国, 管俊, 苑景平. 氮肥运筹对玉米氮素动态变化和氮肥利用的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2012, 20(3):128-135 |
[37] | 王云奇, 陶洪斌, 黄收兵, 徐丽娜, 杨利华, 祁利潘, 王璞. 施氮模式对夏玉米氮肥利用和产量效益的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2013, 27(2):219-224 |
[38] | 李春雷, 王海泽, 门福强. 不同追肥时期对玉米生长的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2016, 22(4):119-122 |
[39] | 宋雪皎, 马兴林, 关义新, 李首成. 影响糯玉米鲜食品质因素的研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2005, 13(1):115-118 |
[40] | 陈迪文, 江永, 周文灵, 沈大春, 敖俊华, 黄莹, 黄振瑞, 李奇伟. 不同新型增效尿素对甜玉米产量及氮素利用率的影响[J]. 农业科学, 2017, 7(4):310-316 |
[41] | 陆大雷, 闫发宝, 陆卫平. 鲜食糯玉米籽粒理化特性的基因型差异[J]. 核农学报, 2012, 26(1):95-101 |
[42] | 杨欢, 黄天琪, 施凯, 陆大雷, 陆卫平. 糯玉米淀粉形成过程中理化特性的变化[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2017, 32(5):43-49 |
[43] |
Paterson J L, Hardacre A, Li P, Rao M A. Rheology and granule size distributions of corn starch dispersions from two genotypes and grown in four regions[J]. Food Hydrocolloids, 2001, 15(4):453-459
DOI URL |
[44] | 陆大雷, 郭换粉, 董策, 陆卫平. 生长季节对糯玉米淀粉粒分布和热力学特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(11):1998-2003 |
[45] | 陈国清, 王鑫, 陆大雷, 陆卫平. 基肥配施和拔节期追氮对鲜食糯玉米子粒热力学特性的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2014, 22(6):102-107, 113 |
[46] | 程玉静, 陈国清, 石明亮, 陆虎华, 郝德荣, 冒宇翔, 黄小兰, 张振良, 周广飞, 赵浚宇, 薛林. 糯玉米淀粉RVA特征谱与品尝评分相关性研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2017, 29(11):21-24 |
[47] | 施龙建, 文章荣, 张世博, 王珏, 陆卫平, 陆大雷. 开花期干旱胁迫对鲜食糯玉米产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(8):1205-1211 |
[1] | LIU Lingling, AN Congcong, YE Ximiao, YUAN Jianlong, WANG Yuping, ZHANG Feng. Relationships Among Apical Dominance of Potato Tuber, the Number of Main Stem and Yield Components [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(2): 329-340. |
[2] | LAI Pufu, WENG Minjie, TANG Baosha, LI Yibin, WU Li, CHEN Junchen. Effects of Different Drying Methods on the Rehydration and Quality Characteristics of Hypsizygus marmoreus Based on Low-field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Technology [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(2): 350-361. |
[3] | LING Jiangang, DUAN Yuquan, AN Shengmin, LIN Qiong, ZHU Lin, LIU Donghong. Effects of Exogenous Nitric Oxide Combined With 1-Methylcyclopropene Treatment on the Quality and Reactive Oxygen Metabolism of Juicy Peaches During Storage at Room Temperature [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(2): 362-368. |
[4] | ZHAO Ling, CAO Rong, LIU Qi, GAO Fengtao, HU Mengyue. Nutritional Evaluation and Characteristic Flavor Analysis of Different Muscle Parts of Oncorhynchus kisutch [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(2): 384-391. |
[5] | HOU Fuyun, CHEN Guiling, DONG Shunxu, XIE Beitao, QIN Zhen, LI Aixian, ZHANG Liming, WANG Qingmei. Comparative Study on Starch Composition, Physicochemical Properties and Noodle Quality of Different Sweet Potato Varieties [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(2): 392-401. |
[6] | BAN Wenhui, WANG Xingqiang, LIU Qiangjuan, SUN Jianbo, LYU Kaiyuan, KANG Jianhong. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Potato Yield, Starch Content and Related Enzyme Metabolic During Tuber Formation After High Temperature Stress [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(2): 422-434. |
[7] | DONG Fei, LI Feng, JIA Yaqin, YANG Feng, YAN Qiuyan, LU Jinxiu, SHEN Yanting. Effect of Nitrogen Topdressing Rate on Yield and Quality of Black-Grained Wheat Varieties (Strains) [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(2): 435-444. |
[8] | LI Yulin, XU Chengyu, HU Xue, ZANG Qian, LU Xuanrui, JIANG Min, ZHUANG Hengyang, HUANG Lifen. Soil Nutrient Characteristics of Organic and Conventional Fertilization Models and Effects on Yields and Qualities of Japonica Rice of Different Palatability Types [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(2): 445-455. |
[9] | WANG Huili, ZHENG Xiaodong. Impact of Piriformospora indica on the Yield, Quality and Postharvest Disease Resistance of Fruit in Cherry Tomato [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(2): 466-472. |
[10] | MENG Lili, CAO Kai, SUN Qian, BAI Zongchun, ZHANG Yi. Effects of Different Ratios of Red Light and Far Red Light on Growth, Photosynthetic Characteristics and Quality of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L. [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(1): 226-235. |
[11] | XU Weiqing, WANG Xiaolei, LIU Yang, OU-YANG Linjuan, LI Weixing, OU-YANG Qinglan, HE Haohua, ZHU Changlan. QTL Mapping of Rice Cooking Characteristics and Correlation Analysis of Sensory Food Quality [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(1): 66-74. |
[12] | LI Junxia, QIN Na, ZHU Cancan, WANG Chunyi, DAI Shutao, SONG Yinghui, CHEN Yuxiang. Study on Photosynthetic Characteristics of Foxtail Millet Mutant With Yellow Leaf Colour [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(9): 1964-1970. |
[13] | LI Man, ZHANG Xiao, LIU Datong, JIANG Wei, GAO Derong, ZHANG Yong. Research on Quality Evaluation Indices of Weak Gluten Wheat [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(9): 1979-1986. |
[14] | WANG Tong, YANG Hui, ZHU Guangcheng, WANG Zhaozhao, XIE Yongkang, HAN Junhao, ZHAI Chenlu, LU Fengyin. Effects of Hot Air, Microwave and Combined Drying on Nutritional Properties and Sensory Quality of Peanut [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(9): 2102-2110. |
[15] | LAI Pufu, TANG Baosha, LI Yibin, WU Li, WENG Minjie, CHEN Junchen. Grey Correlation Analysis for Physical and Nutritional Quality of Hypsizygus marmoreus From Different Drying Methods [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(9): 2118-2126. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||