Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 2094-2101.DOI: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.09.2094
• Food Irradiation·Food Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Shikai(), WANG Min, CHENG Xinxin, ZHANG Qiyue, WU Peng1,*(
)
Received:
2020-06-09
Accepted:
2020-10-04
Online:
2021-09-10
Published:
2021-07-22
Contact:
WU Peng
通讯作者:
吴澎
作者简介:
张士凯,男,主要从事食品科学研究。E-mail: zskcxx@163.com
基金资助:
ZHANG Shikai, WANG Min, CHENG Xinxin, ZHANG Qiyue, WU Peng. Ultrahigh Pressure Extraction of Polygonatum sibiricum Polysaccharide and Mechanism of Improving Exercise Endurance[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(9): 2094-2101.
张士凯, 王敏, 程欣欣, 张启月, 吴澎. 超高压提取黄精多糖及提高运动耐力机制[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(9): 2094-2101.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.hnxb.org.cn/EN/10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.09.2094
试验号 No. | 液料比A Liquid -material ratio /(mL·g-1) | 保压时间B Compress time/min | 压强 C Pressure intensity /MPa | PPP得率 Yield of PPP/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 30.0 | 7 | 200 | 10.5 |
2 | 22.5 | 4 | 400 | 10.1 |
3 | 22.5 | 7 | 300 | 13.5 |
4 | 15.0 | 4 | 300 | 10.2 |
5 | 15.0 | 10 | 300 | 9.3 |
5 | 22.5 | 7 | 300 | 13.5 |
7 | 22.5 | 7 | 300 | 13.5 |
8 | 22.5 | 10 | 400 | 9.9 |
9 | 30.0 | 10 | 300 | 10.4 |
10 | 15.0 | 7 | 200 | 10.1 |
11 | 22.5 | 10 | 200 | 10.0 |
12 | 22.5 | 7 | 300 | 13.7 |
13 | 22.5 | 7 | 300 | 12.9 |
14 | 22.5 | 4 | 200 | 10.5 |
15 | 30.0 | 4 | 300 | 10.9 |
16 | 30.0 | 7 | 400 | 9.9 |
17 | 15.0 | 7 | 400 | 9.2 |
Table 1 Box-Behnken test design and results
试验号 No. | 液料比A Liquid -material ratio /(mL·g-1) | 保压时间B Compress time/min | 压强 C Pressure intensity /MPa | PPP得率 Yield of PPP/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 30.0 | 7 | 200 | 10.5 |
2 | 22.5 | 4 | 400 | 10.1 |
3 | 22.5 | 7 | 300 | 13.5 |
4 | 15.0 | 4 | 300 | 10.2 |
5 | 15.0 | 10 | 300 | 9.3 |
5 | 22.5 | 7 | 300 | 13.5 |
7 | 22.5 | 7 | 300 | 13.5 |
8 | 22.5 | 10 | 400 | 9.9 |
9 | 30.0 | 10 | 300 | 10.4 |
10 | 15.0 | 7 | 200 | 10.1 |
11 | 22.5 | 10 | 200 | 10.0 |
12 | 22.5 | 7 | 300 | 13.7 |
13 | 22.5 | 7 | 300 | 12.9 |
14 | 22.5 | 4 | 200 | 10.5 |
15 | 30.0 | 4 | 300 | 10.9 |
16 | 30.0 | 7 | 400 | 9.9 |
17 | 15.0 | 7 | 400 | 9.2 |
来源 Source | 平方和 Sun of squares | 自由度 Degrees of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value | 显著性 Significant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 Model | 41.64 | 9 | 4.63 | 52.62 | <0.000 1 | ** |
液料比A Liquid material ratio | 1.05 | 1 | 1.05 | 11.96 | 0.010 6 | * |
保压时间B Compress time | 0.55 | 1 | 0.55 | 6.27 | 0.040 8 | * |
压强C Pressure intensity | 0.50 | 1 | 0.50 | 5.69 | 0.048 6 | * |
AB | 0.04 | 1 | 0.04 | 0.45 | 0.521 7 | |
AC | 0.02 | 1 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.628 5 | |
BC | 0.02 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 0.628 5 | |
A2 | 12.31 | 1 | 12.31 | 140.02 | <0.000 1 | ** |
B2 | 9.60 | 1 | 9.60 | 109.18 | <0.000 1 | ** |
C2 | 13.42 | 1 | 13.42 | 152.57 | <0.000 1 | ** |
残差 Residual | 0.62 | 7 | 0.09 | |||
失拟项 Lack of fit | 0.25 | 3 | 0.08 | 0.90 | 0.516 3 | |
纯误差 Pure error | 0.37 | 4 | 0.09 | |||
总回归 Total return | 42.26 | 16 |
Table 2 Analysis of Variance of Regression Equation Model
来源 Source | 平方和 Sun of squares | 自由度 Degrees of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value | 显著性 Significant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 Model | 41.64 | 9 | 4.63 | 52.62 | <0.000 1 | ** |
液料比A Liquid material ratio | 1.05 | 1 | 1.05 | 11.96 | 0.010 6 | * |
保压时间B Compress time | 0.55 | 1 | 0.55 | 6.27 | 0.040 8 | * |
压强C Pressure intensity | 0.50 | 1 | 0.50 | 5.69 | 0.048 6 | * |
AB | 0.04 | 1 | 0.04 | 0.45 | 0.521 7 | |
AC | 0.02 | 1 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.628 5 | |
BC | 0.02 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 0.628 5 | |
A2 | 12.31 | 1 | 12.31 | 140.02 | <0.000 1 | ** |
B2 | 9.60 | 1 | 9.60 | 109.18 | <0.000 1 | ** |
C2 | 13.42 | 1 | 13.42 | 152.57 | <0.000 1 | ** |
残差 Residual | 0.62 | 7 | 0.09 | |||
失拟项 Lack of fit | 0.25 | 3 | 0.08 | 0.90 | 0.516 3 | |
纯误差 Pure error | 0.37 | 4 | 0.09 | |||
总回归 Total return | 42.26 | 16 |
动物分组 Animal grouping | 食物摄入量 Food intake/(g/只) |
---|---|
空白对照组 Blank control group | 118.88±2.89a |
生黄精提取物组 Rhizoma polygonatum group | 120.13±3.12a |
高剂量组 High dose group | 123.00±2.08a |
中剂量组 Medium dose group | 117.01±2.34a |
低剂量组 Low dose group | 116.08±1.17a |
Table 3 Changes in mouse food intake
动物分组 Animal grouping | 食物摄入量 Food intake/(g/只) |
---|---|
空白对照组 Blank control group | 118.88±2.89a |
生黄精提取物组 Rhizoma polygonatum group | 120.13±3.12a |
高剂量组 High dose group | 123.00±2.08a |
中剂量组 Medium dose group | 117.01±2.34a |
低剂量组 Low dose group | 116.08±1.17a |
Fig.3 Comparison of mouse exhaustive swimming time Note:Compared with the control group, * and ** indicate significant difference at 0.05 and 0.01 level, respectively.
指标 Indexes | 空白对照组 Blank control | 空白游泳组 White swimming | PPP游泳组 PPP swimming |
---|---|---|---|
Lac含量 Lac content/(mmol·L-1) | 6.03±0.94c | 11.66±0.80a | 8.23±0.50b |
SUN含量 SUN content/(mmol· L-1) | 8.27±2.64c | 10.67±0.61a | 9.08±0.36b |
LDH活性 LDH activity/(U·L-1) | 2 703.60±185.92c | 4 459.10±175.10a | 3 456.89±35.31b |
T-SOD活性 T-SOD activity/(U·mL-1) | 70.79±17.09a | 71.84±15.46a | 80.03±12.20a |
Table 4 Determination of serum biochemical indicators in mice
指标 Indexes | 空白对照组 Blank control | 空白游泳组 White swimming | PPP游泳组 PPP swimming |
---|---|---|---|
Lac含量 Lac content/(mmol·L-1) | 6.03±0.94c | 11.66±0.80a | 8.23±0.50b |
SUN含量 SUN content/(mmol· L-1) | 8.27±2.64c | 10.67±0.61a | 9.08±0.36b |
LDH活性 LDH activity/(U·L-1) | 2 703.60±185.92c | 4 459.10±175.10a | 3 456.89±35.31b |
T-SOD活性 T-SOD activity/(U·mL-1) | 70.79±17.09a | 71.84±15.46a | 80.03±12.20a |
Fig.4 MDA content in mouse liver Note:Compared with the control group, * indicate significant differences at 0.05 level. Compared with the blank swimming group, # indicate significant differences at 0.05 level.
指标 Index | 空白对照组 Blank control | 空白游泳组 White swimming | PPP游泳组 PPP swimming |
---|---|---|---|
CK活性CK activity/(U·mg-1prot) | 0.60±0.26a | 0.39±0.13b | 0.45±0.68a |
Na+K+-ATP活性Na+K+-ATP activity/(U· mg-1prot) | 0.29±0.24a | 0.26±0.35a | 0.26±0.13a |
Ca2+Mg2+-ATP活性Ca2+Mg2+-ATP activity/(U·mg-1prot) | 0.46±0.18a | 0.33±0.11a | 0.34±0.16a |
Table 5 Determination of mitochondrial biochemical markers in mouse skeletal muscle
指标 Index | 空白对照组 Blank control | 空白游泳组 White swimming | PPP游泳组 PPP swimming |
---|---|---|---|
CK活性CK activity/(U·mg-1prot) | 0.60±0.26a | 0.39±0.13b | 0.45±0.68a |
Na+K+-ATP活性Na+K+-ATP activity/(U· mg-1prot) | 0.29±0.24a | 0.26±0.35a | 0.26±0.13a |
Ca2+Mg2+-ATP活性Ca2+Mg2+-ATP activity/(U·mg-1prot) | 0.46±0.18a | 0.33±0.11a | 0.34±0.16a |
[1] | 王雨婷, 刘婉滢, 沈舶宁, 赵容, 徐亮, 谢明, 康延国. 黄精的本草考证[J]. 中医药学报, 2019, 47(3)81-86 |
[2] | 李汴生, 张微, 梅灿辉. 超高压和热灭菌对鲜榨菠萝汁品质影响的比较[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(1):359-364 |
[3] |
Zeng G F, Zhang Z Y, Lu L. Protective effects of Polygonatum sibiricum polysaccharide on ovariectomy-induced bone loss in rats[J]. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 2011, 136(1):224-229
DOI URL |
[4] | 毛健, 马海乐. 灵芝多糖的研究进展[J]. 食品科学, 2010, 31(1):295-299 |
[5] |
Wang Y, Qin S C, Pen G Q, et al. Original research: Potential ocular protection and dynamic observation of Polygonatum sibiricum polysaccharide against streptozocin-induced diabetic rats' model[J]. Experimental Biology and Medicine, 2017, 242(1):92-101
DOI URL |
[6] |
Zheng Y, Zhang W C, Wu Z Y, Fu C X, Hui A L, Gao H, Chen P P, Du B, Zhang H W. Two macamide extracts relieve physical fatigue by attenuating muscle damage in mice[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2019, 99(3):1405-1421
DOI PMID |
[7] | 杨华杰, 龚千锋, 于欢, 钟凌云, 张金莲, 王文凯. 黄精不同炮制品抗疲劳及抗氧化作用比较研究[J]. 江西中医药, 2018, 49(2):64-67 |
[8] | 马怀芬, 方欢乐, 刘卓越. 黄精多糖抗疲劳作用的研究[J]. 现代交际(学术版), 2017(9):190-190 |
[9] | 陈靓雯, 柯晓燕. 古法炮制多花黄精提取物抗疲劳作用研究及其机制探讨[J]. 科学技术创新, 2019(4):3-4 |
[10] | 刘跃钧, 朱虹, 蒋燕锋, 葛永金, 戴德雄, 刘秀娟. 复方多花黄精混合提取物的降血脂作用[J]. 食品工业科技, 2019, 40(6):285-288,293 |
[11] | 张伟娜, 李金生, 陈井太, 金燕, 王蕊, 李兵, 卢鹤, 张早华. 黄精功效与炮制的古代文献分析[J]. 中医药信息, 2019(4):45-48 |
[12] | 谢东雪, 陆娟, 王月, 王超雪, 陈瑞战, 高佳欣. 长白山区核桃青皮多糖分离纯化、鉴定及抗氧化活性分析[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(18):281-286 |
[13] |
Chen G T, Yuan B, Wang H X, Qi G H, Cheng S J. Characterization and antioxidant activity of polysaccharides obtained from ginger pomace using two different extraction processes[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2019, 139:801-809
DOI URL |
[14] | 禹晓婷, 苏伟, 齐琦, 姜丽. 响应面优化药食同源基质制曲工艺及酒体成分分析[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(12):123-130 |
[15] |
Zheng Y, Zhang W C, Wu Z Y, Fu C X, Hui A L, Gao H, Chen P P, Du B, Zhang H W. Two macamide extracts relieve physical fatigue by attenuating muscle damage in mice[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2019, 99(3):1405-1421
DOI PMID |
[16] |
Tang Y, Zhu Z Y, Pan L C, Sun H, Song Q Y, Zhang Y. Structure analysis and anti-fatigue activity of a polysaccharide from Lepidium meyenii Walp[J]. Natural Product Research, 2019, 33(17):2480
DOI PMID |
[17] | Li D, Ren J W, Zhang T, Liu R, Wu L, Du Q, Li Y. Anti-fatigue effects of small-molecule oligopeptides isolated from Panax quinquefolium L. in mice[J]. Food and Function, 2018, 9(8):4226-4273 |
[18] | 杨凤雯, 韦秋菊, 刘雪婷. 宽筋藤对小鼠抗疲劳、耐缺氧作用研究[J]. 右江医学, 2020, 48(1):23-27 |
[19] | 王亚雯. 山葵树叶抗疲劳作用及相关机制研究[D]. 南宁: 广西医科大学, 2018 |
[20] |
Frezza C, Cipolat S, Scorrano L. Organelle isolation: Functional mitochondria from mouse liver, muscle and cultured filroblasts[J]. Nature Protocols, 2007, 2(2):287-295
DOI URL |
[21] | 刁岩, 陈斌, 王蕊, 李桥, 赵海田, 张华, 王路, 魏力军, 王振宇. 响应面法优化松多酚微粒制备工艺[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(6):281-288 |
[22] | 曹辰辰, 冯美琴, 孙健, 徐幸莲, 周光宏. 响应面法优化益生发酵剂接种发酵香肠工艺[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(6):69-76 |
[23] |
Gao H, Zhang W C, Wang B S, Hui A, Du B, Wang T T, Meng L, Bian H X, Wu Z Y. Purification, characterization and anti-fatigue activity of polysaccharide fractions from okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) Moench)[J]. Food and Function, 2018, 9(2):1088-1101
DOI URL |
[24] |
Teng Y S, Wu D. Anti-fatigue effect of green tea polyphenols (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG)[J]. Pharmacognosy Magazine, 2017, 13(50):326-331
DOI URL |
[25] |
Rageh M M, El-Gebaly R H. Melanin nanoparticles: Antioxidant activities and effects on γ-ray-induced DNA damage in the mouse[J]. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, 2018, 828:15-22
DOI URL |
[26] |
Grundy L, Daly D M, Chapple C. TRPV1 enhances the afferent response to P2X receptor activation in the mouse urinary bladder[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1):197
DOI PMID |
[27] |
Miao X Y, Xiao B K, Shui S F, Yang J Y, Huang R Q, Dong J X. Metabolomics analysis of serum reveals the effect of danggui buxue tang on fatigued mice induced by exhausting physical exercise[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2018, 151:301
DOI URL |
[28] | 李丽, 杨思文, 施伽. 黄精多糖的提取工艺优化[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2017, 23(5):45-47 |
[29] | 魏炜, 李彦伟, 刘凤霞, 许晓飞, 刘志军. 响应面法优化超高压提取黄精多糖工艺[J]. 精细化工, 2019, 36(5):875-881 |
[30] |
Mao G Z, Wu D M, Wei C Y, Tao W Q, Ye X Q, Chen S G. Reconsidering conventional and innovative methods for pectin extraction from fruit and vegetable waste: Targeting rhamnogalacturonan Ⅰ[J]. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 2019, 94:65-78
DOI URL |
[1] | FANG Shiyuan, MEI Jun, XIE Jing, LI Jianrong. Optimization of Composite Biological Preservative and Freshness-Keeping Effect for Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 34(9): 2011-2020. |
[2] | LI Gaoshang, CHEN Yanting, XUAN Shifen, WANG Zhiyan, XU Dalun, YANG Wenge. Effect of Ultra High Pressure Pretreatment on the Quality ofSolenocera melantho Meat in Frozen Storage [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 33(6): 1131-1136. |
[3] | GUO Jianqiang, CHAI Xiujuan, PANG Xuebing, PEI Juan, WANG Aiying. Mutation Breeding and Medium Optimization of Bacillus sp. With High Cellulase Yielding [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 31(2): 263-270. |
[4] | ZHAN Yao, WANG Jing, TIAN Feng, LI Jian-ping, YU Yong, ZHU Song-ming. Extraction of Functional Ingredients in Agricultural Product by Ultra High Pressure [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 28(4): 692-696. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||