Variation of Intrinsic Water Use Efficiency for Crop

doi:10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2019.09.1873

Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 1873-1881.DOI: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2019.09.1873

• Isotope Tracer Technique·Ecology & Environment·Physiology • Previous Articles

Variation of Intrinsic Water Use Efficiency for Crop

ZHAO Funian^1,*, YANG Hongyan², WANG Runyuan¹, ZHANG Kai¹, QI Yue¹, CHEN Fei¹, WANG Heling¹, ZHAO Hong¹

1 Key Laboratory of Arid Climate Change and Disaster Reduction of China Meteorological Administration/Key Laboratory ofArid Climatic Change and Disaster Reduction of Gansu Province/Lanzhou Institute of Arid Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Lanzhou, Gansu 730020;
2 Liaocheng Soil Fertilizer Station, Liaocheng, Shandong 252000

Received:2018-05-15 Revised:2018-10-04 Online:2019-09-09 Published:2019-07-23

作物内禀水分利用效率变化

赵福年^1,*, 杨红燕², 王润元¹, 张凯¹, 齐月¹, 陈斐¹, 王鹤龄¹, 赵鸿¹

1 中国气象局兰州干旱气象研究所/甘肃省干旱气候变化与减灾重点实验室/中国气象局干旱气候变化与减灾重点实验室,甘肃兰州 730020;
2 聊城市土壤肥料工作站,山东聊城 252000

通讯作者: ^*同第一作者。
作者简介:赵福年,男,助理研究员,主要从事作物水分关系研究。E-mail:zfn0622@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41775107、41505099),国家公益性行业(气象)科研专项(GYHY201506001-2),甘肃省气象局气象科研项目(GSMAMs2018-14)

Abstract

Abstract: In order to explore the difference of intrinsic water use efficiency (IWUE) between different crop types and its environmental impact factors, Kehe28 for maize and Dingxixin24 for wheat were used as experimental materials, through the barrel and plot test, the two set enough moisture and drought stress treatment, observation of corn, wheat in different water content and photosynthetic physiological processes under different meteorological conditions and literature information collection, analysis and comparison between C₃ and C₄ plants, under different environmental conditions and characteristics of the same crop IWUE of slope and stomatal conductance model. The results showed that C₄ corn had higher IWUE than C₃ wheat. Under favorable environmental conditions, the IWUE of wheat was lower, while under unfavorable environmental conditions, wheat tended to increase the IWUE. Meanwhile, C₃ crop growing in humid climate had lower IWUE than that growing in semi-arid climate. The slope of stomatal conductance model of maize was higher than wheat. Additionally, under stressed conditions and semi-arid climate, crops tend to reduce the slope of stomatal conductance model. In conclusion, this research indicates that stomatal conductance of crop could regulate its aperture to maximize water use. Crops tend to conserve water use under stressed conditions, whereas it consumes little water as much as possible under optimal condition to maximize assimilation. The results could provide a basis for crop variety selection and allocation in a research area.

Key words: photosynthesis rate, arid and semi-arid areas, water use efficiency, stomatal conductance model

摘要： 为探究不同作物类型内禀水分利用效率(IWUE)之间的区别及其环境影响因素,本研究以春玉米科河28和春小麦定西新24为试验材料,通过桶栽和小区试验,设置水分充足和干旱胁迫2个处理,观测玉米、小麦在不同水分和不同气象条件下的叶片光合生理过程并收集文献资料,分析比较C₃和C₄作物之间,以及不同环境条件下相同作物IWUE的变化特征及气孔导度模型斜率。结果表明,C₄作物玉米较C₃作物小麦具有更高的IWUE;有利的环境条件下,小麦IWUE较低,而不利的环境条件下,小麦倾向于提高IWUE;生长在湿润区的C₃作物IWUE较低,而半干旱区的C₃作物IWUE较高;小麦的气孔导度模型斜率高于玉米,同时不利的环境条件及干燥的气候条件下,作物倾向于降低气孔导度模型斜率。综上,作物气孔调节方式具有优化利用水分的功能,在不利的环境条件下,作物的水分利用方式倾向于保守,从而在较小的水分消耗下,获得最大的产出。本研究结果为区域作物品种选择及布局提供了参考依据。

关键词: 光合速率, 干旱半干旱区, 水分利用效率, 气孔导度模型

ZHAO Funian, YANG Hongyan, WANG Runyuan, ZHANG Kai, QI Yue, CHEN Fei, WANG Heling, ZHAO Hong. Variation of Intrinsic Water Use Efficiency for Crop[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 33(9): 1873-1881.

赵福年, 杨红燕, 王润元, 张凯, 齐月, 陈斐, 王鹤龄, 赵鸿. 作物内禀水分利用效率变化[J]. 核农学报, 2019, 33(9): 1873-1881.

References

[1] Cook B Ⅰ, Smerdon J E, Seager R, Coats S.Global warming and 21st century drying[J]. Climate Dynamics, 2014, 43(9/10): 2607-2627
[2] Dai A.Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2012, 3(1): 52-58
[3] Passioura J B, Angus J F.Improving productivity of crops in water-limited environments[J]. Advances in Agronomy, 2010, 106(10): 37-75
[4] 戴君虎, 王梦麦, 王焕炯, 白洁, 崔海亭. 近50年中国西北东部半湿润、半干旱过渡带气候变化及生态影响[J]. 第四纪研究, 2010, 29(3): 920-930
[5] 侯贤清,李荣,何文寿,马琨,代晓华. 保水剂对旱作马铃薯产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(5): 1016-1022
[6] 雷俊, 张凯, 姚玉璧, 牛海洋, 石界, 李强, 李文举, 赵鸿. 半干旱区黑膜覆盖对马铃薯光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 干旱气象, 2017, 35(6):1036-1041
[7] 温斐斐, 孙敏, 邓联峰, 赵维峰, 高志强. 旱地小麦休闲期深翻覆盖对土壤水分及其利用效率的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(7): 1358-1364
[8] Linderson M L, Mikkelsen T N, Ibrom A, Lindroth A, Ro-Poulsen H, Pilegaard K.Up-scaling of water use efficiency from leaf to canopy as based on leaf gas exchange relationships and the modeled in canopy light distribution[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2012, 152: 201-211
[9] 杨文平, 郭天财, 刘胜波, 朱云集, 王晨阳, 王永华. 两种穗型冬小麦品种旗叶光合特性和水分利用对光强的响应[J]. 华北农学报, 2008, 23(2): 9-11
[10] 魏小平, 王根轩, 吴冬秀. 干旱和CO₂浓度升高对不同春小麦光合作用和气孔阻力及水分蒸腾效率的影响[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 41(6): 42-46
[11] 王晨光, 郝兴宇, 李红英,韩洲怀,韩雪,宗毓铮,李萍. CO₂浓度升高对大豆光合作用和叶绿素荧光的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2015, 29(8):1583-1588
[12] Wong S C, Cowan Ⅰ R, Farquhar G D.Leaf conductance in relation to rate of CO₂ assimilation. Ⅲ. Influences of water stress and photoinhibition[J]. Plant physiology, 1985, 78(4): 830-834
[13] Fischer R A, Turner N C.Plant productivity in the arid and semiarid zones[J]. Annual of Review Plant Physiology, 1978, 29(1): 277-317
[14] Wong S C, Cowan Ⅰ R, Farquhar G D.Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity[J]. Nature, 1979, 282(5737): 424-426
[15] Ball J T, Woodrow I E, Berry J A.A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions[C]//Progress in Photosynthesis Research: Proceedings of the VIIth International Congress on Photosynthesis,Rhode Island: Springer,1987: 221-224
[16] Leuning R.A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model for C₃ plants[J]. Plant Cell and Environment, 1995, 18(4): 339-355
[17] Medlyn B E, Duursma R A, Eamus D, Ellsworth D S, Prentice Ⅰ C, Barton C Ⅴ M, Crous K Y, Angelis P, Freeman M, Wingate L. Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance[J]. Global Change Biology, 2011, 17(6): 2134-2144
[18] Collatz G J, Ball J T, Grivet C, Berry J A.Physiological and environmental-regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration-a model that includes a laminar boundary-layer[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorolology, 1991, 54(2/3/4): 107-136
[19] Baldocchi D.An analytical solution for coupled leaf photosynthesis and stomatal conductance models[J]. Tree Physiology, 1994, 14(7/8/9): 1069-1079
[20] Tuzet A, Perrier A, Leuning R.A coupled model of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration[J]. Plant Cell and Environment, 2003, 26(7): 1097-1116
[21] Yu Q, Zhang Y G, Liu Y F, Shi P L.Simulation of the stomatal conductance of winter wheat in response to light, temperature and CO₂ changes[J]. Annual Botony London, 2004, 93(4): 435-441
[22] Sellers P J, Dickinson R E, Randall D A, Betts A K.Modeling the exchanges of energy, water, and carbon between continents and the atmosphere[J]. Science, 1997, 275(5299): 502-509
[23] Xu L K, Baldocchi D D.Seasonal trends in photosynthetic parameters and stomatal conductance of blue oak (Quercus douglasii) under prolonged summer drought and high temperature[J]. Tree Physiology, 2003, 23(13): 865-877
[24] Tenhunen J D, Serra A S, Harley P C, Dougherty R L, Reynolds J F.Factors influencing carbon fixation and water use by mediterranean sclerophyll shrubs during summer drought[J]. Oecologia, 1990, 82(3): 381-393
[25] Brodribb T.Dynamics of changing intercellular CO₂ concenTration (Ci) during drought and determination of minimum functional ci[J]. Plant Physiology, 1996, 111(1): 179-187
[26] Baldocchi D D.Measuring and modelling carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange over a temperate broad-leaved forest during the 1995 summer drought[J]. Plant Cell Environment, 1997, 20(9): 1108-1122
[27] Gutschick Ⅴ P, Simonneau T.Modelling stomatal conductanceof field-grown sunflower under varying soil water content and leafenvironment: comparison of three models of stomatal response toleaf environment and coupling with an abscisic acid-based modelof stomatal response to soil drying[J]. Plant Cell and Environment, 2002, 25(11): 1423-1434
[28] Medrano H, Esalona J M, Bota J, Gulias J, Flexas J.Regulation of photosynthesis of C₃ plant in response to progressive drought: Stomatal conductance as a reference parameter[J]. Annual Botany, 2002, 89(7):895-905
[29] Lin Y S, Medlyn B E, Duursma R A, Prentice Ⅰ C, Wang H, Baig S, Eamus D, Dios Ⅴ R D, Mitchell P, Ellsworth D S. Optimal stomatal behaviour around the world[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2015, 5(5): 324-330
[30] 任鸿瑞, 罗毅. 鲁西北平原冬小麦和夏玉米耗水量的实验研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2004, 23(4):37-39
[31] Broeckx L S, Fichot R, Verlinden M S, Ceulemans R.Seasonal variations in photosynthesis, in trinsic water-use efficiency and stable isotope composition of poplar leaves in a short-rotation plantation[J]. Tree Physiology, 2014, 34(7): 701
[32] Cifre J, Bota J, Escalona J M, Medrano H, Flexas J.Physiological tools for irrigation scheduling in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): An open gate to improve water-use efficiency?[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 2005, 106(2/3): 159-170
[33] Nikolov N T, Massman W J, Schoettle A W.Coupling biochemical and biophysical processes at the leaf level: An equilibrium photosynthesis model for leaves of C₃ plants[J]. Ecology Model, 1995, 80(2/3): 205-235
[34] Trevor K, Santi S, Carlos G.Soil water stress and coupled photosynthesis-conductance models: Bridging the gap between conflicting reports on the relative roles of stomatal, mesophyll conductance and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2010, 150(3): 443-453
[35] Egea G, Verhoef A, Vidale P L.Towards an improved and more flexible representation of water stress in coupled photosynthesis-stomatal conductance models[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2011, 151(10): 1370-1384
[36] Damour G, Simonneau T, Cochard H, Urban L.An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level[J]. Plant Cell Environment, 2010, 33(9): 1419-1438
[37] Gilbert M E, Zwieniecki M A, Holbrook N M.Independent variation in photosynthetic capacity and stomatal conductance leads to differences in intrinsic water use efficiency in 11 soybean genotypes before and during mild drought[J]. Journal Experiment Botany, 2011, 62(8): 2875-2887
[38] Singh S K, Reddy K R.Regulation of photosynthesis, fluorescence, stomatal conductance and water-use efficiency of cowpea under drought[J]. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 2011, 105(1): 40-50
[39] Zheng H, Zhang X, Ma W, Song J, Rahman S U, Wang J, Zhang Y.Morphological and physiological responses to cyclic drought in two contrasting genotypes of Catalpa bungei[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2017, 138: 21-32

Metrics

Comments

创刊：1987年
主管部门：农业农村部
主办单位：中国原子能农学会与中国农业科学院农产品加工研究所（前中国农业科学院原子能利用研究所）
ISSN：1000-8551

访问统计
总访问：
今日访问：
当前在线：

Variation of Intrinsic Water Use Efficiency for Crop

作物内禀水分利用效率变化

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LYU Jian, LI Jinwu, YU Jihua, XIE Jianming, FENG Zhi, ZHANG Guobin, LIU Na, WANG Junwen. Effects of Different Surface Covering Methods on Soil Temperature,Yeild and Water Utilization of Loose-Curd Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.) [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(8): 1941-1951.
[2]	ZHENG Mengjing, ZHANG Lihua, DONG Zhiqiang, SHEN Haiping, YAO Haipo, ZHANG Lirong, JIA Xiuling. Effects of Micro-sprinkling Irrigation on Yield and Water Use Efficiency in Summer Maize [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 34(4): 839-848.
[3]	ZHANG Guanchu, SHI Xiaolong, CI Dunwei, DING Hong, YANG Jishun, TIAN Jiaming, ZHANG Zhimeng, DAI Liangxiang. Effect of Drought and Salt Stress on Accumulation of Plant Dry Weight and Photosynthetic Characteristics [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 33(5): 999-1005.
[4]	YE Zipiao, DUAN Shihua, KANG Huajing. Comparison of Water Use Efficiency for Glycine max Leaves Under Different CO₂ Concentration [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 33(5): 1006-1015.
[5]	CUI Zhengjun, GAO Yuhong, YAN Bin, WU Bin, NIU Junyi, ZHAO Bangqing, ZHAO Yongwei, LI Ying. Effect of Water and Nitrogen Coupling on Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Soil Water and Water Consumption Characteristic and Grain Yield of Oil Flax [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 33(2): 398-411.
[6]	LI Fen, HOU Xianqing, LI Rong. Effect of Dual-mulching of Ridge-and-Furrow on Water Consumption Characteristics, Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Potato in Dryland Farming [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 33(12): 2472-2481.
[7]	ZHAO Hongliang,WANG Qi,SUN Yu,ZENG Xiannan,ZHANG Xiaoming,WANG Ping,WANG Manli,FENG Yanjiang. Effect of Different Irrigation Regimes on Rice Yield and Water Use Efficiency Under Straw Returning to Field [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 32(5): 959-969.
[8]	HOU Xianqing,LI Rong,HE Wenshou, MA Kun,DAI Xiaohua. Effects of Super Absorbent on Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Potato in Dry Land [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 32(5): 1016-1022.
[9]	JING Da-wei, XING Shang-jun, ZHU Ya-ping, MA Hai-lin, DU Zhen-yu, LIU Fang-chun, MA Bing-yao. Short-Term Effects of Root Pruning on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Growth of Populus×euramericana cv. ‘Neva’ [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 28(7): 1314-1319.
[10]	LIU Chao, ZHU Hui-jie, ZHU Yun-ji, ZHANG Guo-zhao, XIE Ying-xin. Effects of Irrigation and Sulphur Application on Grain Yield and Water Use Efficiency in Winter Wheat [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 28(11): 2108-2114.
[11]	WU Bing, GAO Yu-hong, XIE Ya-ping, WANG Wang-tian, CHEN Yong-jun, LING Peng, NIU Jun-yi. Effects of Planting Density on Filling Rate, Water Use Efficiency and Yield for One Film Used Two Years of Oil Flax [J]. J4, 2013, 27(12): 1912-1919.
[12]	LIU Xiao-wei, HE Bao-lin, GUO Tian-wen. EFFECTS OF FULL MULCHING ON DOUBLE RIDGES WITH DIFFERENT MULCHING METHODS ON SOIL WATER CONTENT AND MAIZE YIELD IN DRYLAND [J]. J4, 2012, (3): 602-608,627.
[13]	YANG Rui-ju, CHAI Shou-xi, MA Zhong-ming, CHE Zong-xian, BAO Xing-guo, ZHANG Jiu-dong. WATER AND FERTILIZER COUPLING ON SOIL WATER DYNAMICS AND YIELD IN INTERCROPPED WHEAT AND MAIZE [J]. J4, 2011, 25(5): 1004-1009.
[14]	WANG Shu-ying1 FAN Ting-lu1 DING Ning-ping2 ZHAO Gang1. CROP YIELD AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY UNDER LONG-TERM FERTILIZATION IN LOESS PLATEAU [J]. J4, 2010, 24(5): 1044-1050.
[15]	MA Li1,2 LIU Tian-xue1 HAN De-guo2 FU Jing1 ZHAO Zhen-jie1 LI Chao-ha. EFFECTS OF RIDGE CULTURE ON GRAIN YIELD AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY OF WINTER WHEAT AND SUMMER MAIZE [J]. J4, 2010, 24(5): 1062-1067.